Comments on: Introduction to Exchange Server 2016 Database Availability Groups https://practical365.com/exchange-2016-database-availability-groups/ Practical Office 365 News, Tips, and Tutorials Thu, 25 Jul 2024 13:28:10 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.1 By: Ajay https://practical365.com/exchange-2016-database-availability-groups/#comment-297258 Thu, 25 Jul 2024 13:28:10 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=9015#comment-297258 Hello Paul,
The articles are awsome.
Could you add the broken link for the points mentioned below in article:
. Database switchovers and failovers for Exchange Server 2016 database availability groups
. Reseeding a failed database copy in an Exchange Server 2016 DAG
Thanks,
Ajay

]]>
By: steve martin https://practical365.com/exchange-2016-database-availability-groups/#comment-233961 Fri, 12 Mar 2021 22:33:30 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=9015#comment-233961 In reply to Alex Brentanos.

I have the same question. Have two Exchange 2016 servers in a DAG both running on Windows Server 2012R2. Need to get the Exchange databases on servers running Windows Server 2016. Can’t add new Exchange server to DAG if different OS. Can I create new DAG, add new Exchange servers and migrate databases? If so, how to configure subnets?

]]>
By: Alex Brentanos https://practical365.com/exchange-2016-database-availability-groups/#comment-231418 Sun, 20 Sep 2020 18:18:14 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=9015#comment-231418 Hello Paul, I am not sure if this exact question has been answered before. I have a an existing 2010 DAG with 2 members and I am looking to create a new DAG using 2 Exchange 2016 servers. We are in an Exchange Hybrid setup and most mailboxes have been already migrated already to Exchange Online.

I would like to create a new DAG and a mailbox database on the 2016 servers and then move any mailboxes that must remain on prem to the new DAG. I would then decommission the 2010 Exchange servers as they are approaching end of life.

I would like to setup a the new 2016 DAG without and administration point. The 2016 servers have been created with 2 nics each and with the correct settings for the replication NIC.

The replication subnet on all 4 servers is the same, example 192.168.1.0/24.

Question 1 – If i create the 2016 DAG using the same replication subnet, is that going to mess up the existing 2010 DAG?

Question 2 – Do you recommend setting up the DAG manually or letting Exchange auto configure.

Thanks in advance for your feedback.

]]>
By: Francis https://practical365.com/exchange-2016-database-availability-groups/#comment-228281 Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:47:38 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=9015#comment-228281 In reply to exchange_jq.

You need to enable DataCenterActivation mode for this to work correctly. But this will require a (small) manual task to enable smooth/correct failover.

E.g. if (AD)site A goes down, your mailboxes will be mounted on your passive Exchange servers, but exchange will not mark the servers in Site A as down. You should then run ‘stop-databaseavailabilitygroup -identity -ActiveDirectorySite ‘Site A’

this will enable full functionality of Site B even without access to the FSW and no hiccups when Site A comes back online. after Site A is deemed fully only again, you can run ‘restore-databaseavailabilitygroup -ActiveDirectorySite ‘Site A’

]]>
By: Patrick https://practical365.com/exchange-2016-database-availability-groups/#comment-226084 Thu, 12 Sep 2019 19:42:52 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=9015#comment-226084 Iknow this is an old article but I hope you can still help. We have one DAG on 2 – 2016 servers with one witness server on the DNS server. When one exchange server goes down, most internal clients cannot connect from outlook for their mail. Others do not. I think everyone has their outlook clients pointed to a particular server (i.e. some go to mail1 and others point to mail2). How do I get all clients to work after one of servers go down? We don’t have a load balancer. I saw info about creating a round robin DNS with a generic FQDN like “mail” and put in the IPs of both servers for “mail” then point the clients to that. Is that the way to go or is AutoDiscover supposed to take care of it?? Will that cause issues in the long run? How long does it take for a client to grab the IP of the other server? Is it based on my refresh time in DNS or Expire Time?

]]>
By: EN https://practical365.com/exchange-2016-database-availability-groups/#comment-222058 Tue, 06 Aug 2019 02:59:03 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=9015#comment-222058 Hi Paul,

I have an existing 2 node DAG (1 on-prem and 1 on DR site). How can I accomplish adding a 3rd node to the existing DAG? How do I properly setup the new Exchange server 2016 as a member of the existing DAG?

]]>
By: exchange_jq https://practical365.com/exchange-2016-database-availability-groups/#comment-215750 Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:44:27 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=9015#comment-215750 Hi Paul,

I am looking for a clear definitive answer on this one. I have a 2 node DAG and a FSW. Node A and FSW are in primary datacenter, Node B is in secondary datacenter. We recently moved all of our DBs active copies to the secondary datacenter on Node B.

We then lost our primary datacenter, so Node A and FSW went completely dark. What would the expected behaviour be here for the mounted DBs in secondary datacenter? As one DAG member was offline along with FSW, shouldn’t these active DBs have dismounted automatically?

I am told they remained mounted from the console/GUI perspective but we had user complaints they couldn’t access email. I am seeing contradicting information on what will happen if you lost the link between your 2 DCs and your active DBs are on a different site to the FSW?

]]>
By: Terry https://practical365.com/exchange-2016-database-availability-groups/#comment-199072 Wed, 03 Apr 2019 02:08:21 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=9015#comment-199072 Good evening Paul

I’m reading your post(s) about DAG, I read also on other sites (your posts are always clear and well explained).
A DAG seems to be useful if we want to provide high availability for users, on the primary office site, using a quorum witness.

In case I have only one exchange server on the primary Office site, and would like a second Exchange server in a DR site (no users on that site), is it possible to have a DAG that will have both servers (ExchangeOffice and ExchangedDR) as members ? Sites have different IP range, Sites have their own domain controler named DC.domain.local and DR.domain.local.

Will this configuration assure me that users will have access to their emails in case the ExchangeOffice server goes down (slower acces because of the inter-site link) ?

In case the Office site goes down, with no more quorum (located at the office that is no longer working) will the ExchangeDR database start with an unreachable quorum ? Is the solution (I think you mentioned it) of having a Quorum on a shared folder on azure the solution so quorum will always be reachable ?

I think this is what you mentioned as “site resilience”, so I basically supposed there is one DAG with members on two different sites but I doubt it is as easy as that.

thank you if you can just clarify this point so I will stop beeing stuck for nothing.

Terry

]]>
By: Alfred https://practical365.com/exchange-2016-database-availability-groups/#comment-196900 Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:02:59 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=9015#comment-196900 Hi Paul,

Customer have a Primary Exchange, and would like to have another in DR site, the intranet bandwidth is about 30mbps. ( wireless connection between 2 sites )

possible to run it ?

]]>
By: Rob https://practical365.com/exchange-2016-database-availability-groups/#comment-161097 Sun, 02 Sep 2018 12:54:35 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=9015#comment-161097 Hi Paul,
Very useful article as ever. I can’t decide between 2 or 3 members on my DAG. I run a single site Exchange 2016 installation with about 50 mailboxes. All hosted in house across a couple of VM hosts running Server 2016 on ESXi. The 2 current members aren’t on the same VM.

Is it worth sticking a new server on there or just pointless replication?

thanks…

]]>