Comments on: Migrating from a Single Exchange 2010 Server to High Availability https://practical365.com/migrating-single-exchange-2010-server-high-availability/ Practical Office 365 News, Tips, and Tutorials Fri, 13 Jan 2017 07:37:47 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.1 By: Phil https://practical365.com/migrating-single-exchange-2010-server-high-availability/#comment-7258 Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:29:37 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=2480#comment-7258 In reply to Paul Cunningham.

I decided to go with Kemp, I have the CAS Array built and configured, but am now stuck at how to point the CAS on the new exchange server to the Kemp virtual CAS Array. The instructions I’ve seen don’t make complete sense to me. I want to make sure I get this piece correct before I create the DAG.

Any clarity you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

]]>
By: John https://practical365.com/migrating-single-exchange-2010-server-high-availability/#comment-7257 Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:25:20 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=2480#comment-7257 Here is an odd one, we have a CAS Array working properly (2 Servers) and 2 Mailbox servers…. Exactly as shown in your last Visio diagram.

What is the best, fastest and easiest process to revert this setup back into a Single Exchange Server ?

All feedback much appreciated.

]]>
By: Paul Cunningham https://practical365.com/migrating-single-exchange-2010-server-high-availability/#comment-7256 Fri, 04 Dec 2015 21:57:41 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=2480#comment-7256 In reply to Phil.

Yes.

]]>
By: Phil https://practical365.com/migrating-single-exchange-2010-server-high-availability/#comment-7255 Fri, 04 Dec 2015 18:07:00 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=2480#comment-7255 In reply to Paul Cunningham.

Another question; can the new CAS array and DAG co-exist with the original Exchange 2010 server? What I mean is, can I build the new CAS array create the new DAG and test the migration of an email account to the new DAG database all the while having the original Exchange server online? What I want to test is the Outlook client after it is moved to the DAG to make sure the Outlook clients move to the new CAS array automatically.

Thanks

]]>
By: Phil https://practical365.com/migrating-single-exchange-2010-server-high-availability/#comment-7254 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 13:44:46 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=2480#comment-7254 Thanks… That makes sense now.

]]>
By: <div class="apbct-real-user-wrapper"> <div class="apbct-real-user-author-name">Paul Cunningham</div> <div class="apbct-real-user-badge" onmouseover=" let popup = document.getElementById('apbct_trp_comment_id_7253'); popup.style.display = 'inline-flex'; "> <div class="apbct-real-user-popup" id="apbct_trp_comment_id_7253"> <div class="apbct-real-user-title"> <p class="apbct-real-user-popup-header">The Real Person!</p> <p class="apbct-real-user-popup-text">Author <b>Paul Cunningham</b> acts as a real person and passed all tests against spambots. Anti-Spam by CleanTalk.</p> </div> </div> </div> </div> https://practical365.com/migrating-single-exchange-2010-server-high-availability/#comment-7253 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 22:07:52 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=2480#comment-7253 In reply to Phil.

NLB is a feature of Windows Server. It is correct that NLB can’t be used if the servers are also DAG members. It can be used if the CAS roles are installed on separate servers.

However, I don’t recommend using NLB. It is not a good load balancing solution for Exchange. I recommend you use a third party load balancer or virtual load balancer from a vendor such as Kemp or F5. This will be a good investment for your future because Exchange 2013 and beyond make NLB an even worse choice than it already is.

Using NLB will mean a minimum of 4 Exchange servers. Using a load balancer will mean a minimum of 2 Exchange servers + the load balancer, a much better solution.

So, my recommendation is as before.

]]>
By: Phil https://practical365.com/migrating-single-exchange-2010-server-high-availability/#comment-7252 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:47:28 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=2480#comment-7252 In reply to Phil.

More specifically this:

Two or more Exchange Server 2010 Client Access Servers can be configured as a CAS array using NLB as long they are not also installed as Mailbox servers that are members of a Database Availability Group (DAG).

I’m confused.

]]>
By: Phil https://practical365.com/migrating-single-exchange-2010-server-high-availability/#comment-7251 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 13:30:24 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=2480#comment-7251 In reply to Paul Cunningham.

I thought you could not have a load balancer on the same server as those running DAG?

]]>
By: Paul Cunningham https://practical365.com/migrating-single-exchange-2010-server-high-availability/#comment-7250 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 01:11:49 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=2480#comment-7250 In reply to Phil.

If you have a single Exchange 2010 server with all the roles installed today, then the best path for you is to build a second server with all roles installed. You can then add a load balancer to the solution for CAS high availability, and make both servers members of a DAG for mailbox high availability.

]]>
By: Phil https://practical365.com/migrating-single-exchange-2010-server-high-availability/#comment-7249 Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:08:36 +0000 https://www.practical365.com/?p=2480#comment-7249 Paul,
I have this same situation (single Exchange 2010 server with all roles). Do I understand your strategy correctly in that I will need three new servers (one to create the CAS array, and two for DAG? Then move the existing server into the CAS array afterwards?

]]>